Catholicism neither Republican nor Democrat

A friend sent me a news brief from Catholic News Service.  The subject of the article was "’Pro-life, pro-poor’ lawmakers rare but seek them out, activists told".  My friend’s favorite line from the article is a quote from John Carr, head of the U.S. bishops’ Secretariat for Social Development and World Peace:

"We are not the Democratic Party of prayer," he said. "We are not the religious caucus of the Republican Party."

This reminds me of a recent post I made on a Yahoo! message board in response to a post titled "Libs and Cons get it wrong".

> What’s worse is that the political intelligencia
> has convinced Americans that there only 2 ways to
> look at things: Repub vs Dem, Lib vs Con, left vs right.
> That’s the true disgrace that squelches debate and reason.

True. That’s the thing that confounded people about Pope John Paul II (the Great) – he was liberal on some things (care for the poor; against the war in Iraq; anti-death penalty) and conservative on other things (against abortion, cloning, embryonic stem cell research; advocated religion and absolutist morality being guideposts for government; for prayer in schools).

He was also able to be against communism and socialism, while also denouncing the excesses of capitalism.

How else to explain this, other than that truth is binocular, and love is symphonic, and the cross is a sign of contradiction to the world?

"The message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God… For Jews demand signs and Greeks look for wisdom, but we proclaim Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles, but to those who are called, Jews and Greeks alike, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. For the foolishness of God is wiser than human wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than human strength." 1 Cor 1:18,22-25

The same way that no one person has the market cornered on morality and right judgement, even more the political parties (of any country) are deficient in this regard.  This is probably most evident in the myth of "the Catholic vote" – even though both parties heavily courted Catholics in the last few elections (due to a belief that they vote as a bloc), Catholics were split fairly evenly between the candidates (Bush got only a few more percentage points than Kerry).  

Liberal Catholics tend to vote more with Democrats, because of social concerns (i.e., the poor).  The main reason conservative or orthodox Catholics and Christians tend to vote Republican is because of abortion, euthanasia, and other moral concerns.  However, even these generalizations are just that – general.  They are not clear-cut, because there are variances within the parties, in spite of what the official party platform might be.  A good example of this are the Democrats for Life.

BTW, Catholic Answers has a voter’s guide that can be used as a filter to screen out candidates who absolutely do not follow Catholic principles.  After the bad ones have been weeded out (generally more helpful during primaries, when trying to decide among more than 2 candidates), the remaining issues are up to your own opinions of what is most beneficial to society.

I don’t believe that the current divisions squelch debate and reason.  In spite of the bickering and arguing (not true debate) of the most prominent politicians, I believe that it engages and fosters discussion by reasonable people, seeking to use the dialectic to come to the truth.  "It is not merely true that a creed unites men.  Nay, a difference of creed unites men–so long as it is a clear difference.  A boundary unites." (G. K. Chesterton, What’s Wrong With the World)

I think it also highlights something that may very well need to be addressed soon – the above-mentioned split in "the Catholic vote".  Catholics are courted, yet split, because different aspects of the Catholic faith are appealed to.  If a party were to come along that embraces the values of pro-life, pro-poor, pro-responsibility, pro-freedom, pro-stewardship, and pro-morality there could be a powerful, almost revolutionary, third-party in this country. 

I’m not going to hold my breath for several reasons: 

  1. the money behind the current 2 parties would necessitate vast resources to start a viable third-party in this country
  2. once in power, those candidates would be too tempted to exemplify the adage "power corrupts" more than exemplifying Catholic principles (nobody seriously wants a return to Christendom)
  3. as with most reform movements, a Catholic third-party might once again prove Chesterton right – "The reformer is always right about what is wrong. He is generally wrong about what is right." (from the Illustrated London News, 10/28/1922)

But for the sake of hopeful imagination (and to put aside some cynicism), maybe a unified Catholic voice in politics, even for just a short time, might be a powerful innoculation for our ailing culture and society.  Imagine pro-life issues and anti-death penalty issues in one party.  Imagine a party with policies toward businesses that fosters family and human welfare first, while also cutting out corruption associated with government handling social services, and returning it to faith-based organizations where it belongs – an end to gov’t sponsored corporate and private welfare.  Imagine a government made up of people that are good stewards of the earth’s resources, but are also constantly striving for the next world.  Imagine a country that admitted and apologized for its mistakes, while forgiving the past mistakes and debts of others – would such a country of humility and pardon be considered a threat to other countries and faiths?

Maybe, Catholic involvement in politics should be treated more like medicine – an occasional dose to heal and cure, but (like medicine) too much is bad for the patient and weakens the effect of future doses.  Maybe the framers of the Constitution got it right in their intentions (but wrong in the implementation) when they desired people to serve their government for a term or two, and then go back home to the family farm.  Maybe this is what Catholics need to do: don’t constantly meddle and tweak and micromanage government – rather, get in, make the necessary changes, and get out.

This entry was posted in News and politics. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Catholicism neither Republican nor Democrat

  1. Unknown says:

    Christianity is far above any political party, but allow me to bash Democrat issues for the sake of uniting Christians under the Republican banner (The Republic is the waypoint, not the destination).
    Care for the poor: Good in theory, not in practice. I took a vow of poverty, slept on the streets, and ate in "soup kitchens" for over a year and I have to tell you most support for the poor only enables their addictions to sex and drugs. Like clockwork, the poor panhandlers get their social security checks at the first of the month and are broke within 3 days because they were making whores and dealers rich. On top of that, alot of drugs finance terrorist organizations, so that poor begger someone thought was going to get a new pair of shoes might have actually bought someone a Columbian necktie.
    Democrats for Life: I visited the DFL forum the week it went up. I came to unite pro-lifers against abortion, they came to unite friends of death-row inmates against Republicans. I offered my hand to the dogs and got bit. The DNC tolerates Democrats for Life because DFL churns out "pro-lifers" who are only nominally against abortion and they serve as a hedge of protection against political backlash when people realize Democrats have murdered 45 million American children. 95% of political contributions against abortion go to Republicans; united we stand, unite or fall.
    Denouncing of Capitalist Materialism: Jesus said choose God or Mammon and told the apostles to get rid of all they had and follow him, so anti-capitalism is certainly a religious right-wing position even though that realization would make many RINOs very very nervous. Now, Republicans are supposedly the party of the rich because they are against taxes, but I\’m against taxes even though I DO NOT USE MONEY, because reducing taxes limits the size of a secular government made up mostly of Democrat employees who want to raises taxes to finance things like foreign forced-abortions (United Nations) and crucifixes in jars of urine (National Endowment for the Arts) as well as financing their liberal Democrat-dominated union workers in the AFSCME. Since republicans are supposed to be the party of the rich, most people would be surprised to find out the top 9 largest all time contributers to US political campaigns are ALL solidly Democrat groups (# 10 is on the fence), but there are simply so many more millionaire Republican entrepreneurs than there are billionaire Democrat drug-lords like George Soros or leftist monster unions like the National Education Association that Republicans end up raising a little more money overall, so the homeless homosexual drug-addicted baby-killing leftists villify Republicans as richies even though the homeless make just as much money conning (before they blow it all on the crack they smoke on the church steps 20 feet from where I slept).
    Ending on a high note…
    A Unified Christian Vote: Senator Rick Santorum is against abortion, against homosexual marriage, for school prayer, and he is discouraging the death penalty while protecting the state\’s right to use it (the same position as the Vatican). He probably won\’t run for president in 2008, but keep your eye on him, he would make a fine Vice President. I expect American Catholics like Santorum to play an increasingly large role in how the world comes to understand America and Christianity as a whole.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s